Did you know that Pacifica is responsible for over 3 million gallons in sewer spills over the last five years? That accounts for more than 49 percent of the total spills attributable to San Mateo County wastewater systems.

There are legal fees, fines and cleanup costs attributed to each spill. So, on top of the premium we are paying for the service, we pay some more for the costs related to the leak.

I wrote a public information request for the cost of the cleanup late last year. The request was vague, so they could have pulled any one event (there was more than one). They closed the ticket with no information on cost. Their response:

“City staff responded to the emergency, and efforts related to the incident were managed in-house by city staff. The city does not have a breakout of cleanup costs related to the incident specified in your request.”

My questions to your readers:

1. What do you think about this response?

2. What exactly is the real cost of owning this sewer system?  

3. At what point do we think Pacifica can get a handle on it?

We need a lot more accountability and transparency! Oppose the rate hike today. 

— Vicki Sundstrom, Pacifica

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

More Stories

  • 0

I would like to proclaim my dismay at the city’s handling of the RV residential parking situation. The idea of moving RVs to “assigned residential parking” solves nothing. The people living in their RVs are still on the streets with no physical, mental or emotional support or services. How d…

  • 0

I read with interest the comments of the panicked residents of Fairway Park about the potential for RV parking on their (public) street. While I understand that society’s persistent problem of a lack of affordable housing is not welcome when presented outside of one’s window, I would challen…

  • 0

I am very concerned about the July 21 deadline that the city has agreed to with respect to RV parking on Pacifica streets. This issue has a tremendous global impact on the quality of life for the residents of Pacifica with respect to safety, public health, and retention of property values. A…

  • 0

On June 28, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed new legislation (AB 832) that extends eviction protection until Sept. 30, 2021. Also, this budget includes a $5.2 billion California Rent Relief Program.

  • 0

I appreciate the heads-up from Jane Northrop regarding the prospects for funding improvements to Sharp Park Road (Tribune, July 7), which I use frequently in cyclist and motorist mode.

  • 1

Newcomers to San Bruno and Pacifica are always shocked to see roadside booths selling fireworks and anyone who YouTubes “Pacifica Fireworks” will see this happening 20 miles north of where a thousand homes burned to the ground last year.

  • 0

Thank you to the city of Pacifica’s Public Works Department and the continued support of Gail Bennett and Ryann Hoffman on Palmetto Avenue’s streetscape bulb-outs. I recently weeded our neighborhood bulb-out at the mini park and Public Works picked up the weed pile. Bennett and Hoffman coord…

Recommended for you